Comps & Reflections

Untitled

2026-05-14 · 5 min read Comps & Reflections
AiPart 27 of 38
Ai Adoption S Curve › Ai Adoption Social N › Ai Adoption Toe Fram › Ai Agents Principal › Ai Ambidexterity Exp › Ai Chatbots Media Ri › Ai Coding Effective › Ai Colleague Structu › Ai Energy Sociotechn › Ai Ethics Ceremonial › Ai Garbage Can Model › Ai Hallucination Tru › Ai Healthcare Identi › Ai Hiring Fairness M › Ai Implementation Fa › Ai Is Research Metho › Ai Labor Market Is R › Ai Models Critical R › Ai Native Developmen › Ai Network Effects D › Ai Observational Lea › Ai Output Boundary O › Ai Participant Work › Ai Pilots Dont Becom › Ai Pilots Dont Becom › Ai Pilots Dont Becom › 27 › Ai Policy Governance › Ai Regulation Global › Ai Safety Pmt Fear D › Ai Security Platform › Ai Self Efficacy Dig › Ai Supercomputing Rb › Ai Task Technology F › Ai Training Data Kno › Ai Transaction Cost › Ai Trust Repair Will › Ai Vendor Concentrat

# Verification for ai-pilots-dont-become-products

## Profile fallbacks
No site-profile.yaml found. Defaulted to:
- voice from existing blog posts (absorptive-capacity post and erp post read for anchoring)
- output_dir: /Users/alisafari/Downloads/PHD/UNT/2026/COMPS/alisafari-space/blog
- length: 800-1500 words (from user prompt)
- structured_data: not applied (user prompt did not request JSON-LD for this post)
- em_dash: banned (explicit in user prompt)

## Sources read, local
- /Users/alisafari/Downloads/PHD/UNT/2026/COMPS/study-hub/day1.html (absorptive capacity section, lines 1217, 1231, 1246, 1311)
- /Users/alisafari/Downloads/PHD/UNT/2026/COMPS/alisafari-space/blog/2026-05-14-absorptive-capacity-why-tools-alone-fail.md (voice anchor)
- /Users/alisafari/Downloads/PHD/UNT/2026/COMPS/alisafari-space/blog/2026-05-14-erp-implementation-failure-structural-not-technical.md (voice anchor)

## Sources read, web
None. All external claims hedged; no URLs fetched or cited in post.

## External links in the post, last verified
None. Post uses only internal links.

## Claims dropped or hedged
- Gartner "85% of AI projects fail" figure: hedged to directional claim only. Reason: year-specific numbers behind paywall and vary by methodology; cited as widely noted without specific percentage.
- IBM Watson Health oncology details (specific hospitals, specific failure modes): kept only the broad press-reported pattern, hedged as "by most accounts."
- McKinsey organizational change argument: dropped as a named citation; folded into general observation about AI value requiring org change, no organizational name attached.

## Word count
1121

## Review iterations
1. First pass verdict: PASS on all critical checks.

## Edit history
2026-05-14. Initial post created per user prompt.


About the author

A
Ali Safari
PhD Student in IS, University of North Texas

Researching AI governance, trust in intelligent systems, and agentic AI. Writing while studying for comps.

Share

More notes

Next →
Untitled

Related notes