Comps & Reflections

Untitled

2026-05-14 · 5 min read Comps & Reflections
AiPart 35 of 51
Ai Adoption S Curve Ai Adoption Social NAi Adoption Toe FramAi Agent Software 37Ai Agents Customer SAi Agents Principal Ai Ambidexterity ExpAi Chatbots Media RiAi Coding Effective Ai Colleague StructuAi Customer Service Ai Dependency ParadoAi Deskilling PeopleAi Energy SociotechnAi Ethics CeremonialAi Future Work AutomAi Garbage Can ModelAi Governance TheateAi Hallucination TruAi Healthcare IdentiAi Hiring Fairness MAi Implementation FaAi Is Research MethoAi Labor Market Is RAi Layoffs Budget RoAi Models Critical RAi Native DevelopmenAi Network Effects DAi Observational LeaAi Output Boundary OAi Participant Work Ai Pilots Dont BecomAi Pilots Dont BecomAi Pilots Dont Becom35Ai Policy GovernanceAi Productivity ParaAi Project CancellatAi Regulation GlobalAi Safety Pmt Fear DAi Scaling Gap EnterAi Security AutomatiAi Security PlatformAi Self Efficacy DigAi Supercomputing RbAi Takes Over RoutinAi Task Technology FAi Training Data KnoAi Transaction Cost Ai Trust Repair WillAi Vendor Concentrat

# Verification for ai-pilots-dont-become-products

## Profile fallbacks
No site-profile.yaml found. Defaulted to:
- voice from existing blog posts (absorptive-capacity post and erp post read for anchoring)
- output_dir: /Users/alisafari/Downloads/PHD/UNT/2026/COMPS/alisafari-space/blog
- length: 800-1500 words (from user prompt)
- structured_data: not applied (user prompt did not request JSON-LD for this post)
- em_dash: banned (explicit in user prompt)

## Sources read, local
- /Users/alisafari/Downloads/PHD/UNT/2026/COMPS/study-hub/day1.html (absorptive capacity section, lines 1217, 1231, 1246, 1311)
- /Users/alisafari/Downloads/PHD/UNT/2026/COMPS/alisafari-space/blog/2026-05-14-absorptive-capacity-why-tools-alone-fail.md (voice anchor)
- /Users/alisafari/Downloads/PHD/UNT/2026/COMPS/alisafari-space/blog/2026-05-14-erp-implementation-failure-structural-not-technical.md (voice anchor)

## Sources read, web
None. All external claims hedged; no URLs fetched or cited in post.

## External links in the post, last verified
None. Post uses only internal links.

## Claims dropped or hedged
- Gartner "85% of AI projects fail" figure: hedged to directional claim only. Reason: year-specific numbers behind paywall and vary by methodology; cited as widely noted without specific percentage.
- IBM Watson Health oncology details (specific hospitals, specific failure modes): kept only the broad press-reported pattern, hedged as "by most accounts."
- McKinsey organizational change argument: dropped as a named citation; folded into general observation about AI value requiring org change, no organizational name attached.

## Word count
1121

## Review iterations
1. First pass verdict: PASS on all critical checks.

## Edit history
2026-05-14. Initial post created per user prompt.


About the author

A
Ali Safari
PhD Student in IS, University of North Texas

Researching AI governance, trust in intelligent systems, and agentic AI. Writing while studying for comps.

Share

More notes

Next →
Untitled

Related notes